• J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatr. · May 2024

    Quantitative MRI outcome measures in CMT1A using automated lower limb muscle segmentation.

    • Luke F O'Donnell, Menelaos Pipis, John S Thornton, Baris Kanber, Stephen Wastling, Amy McDowell, Nick Zafeiropoulos, Matilde Laura, Mariola Skorupinska, Christopher J Record, Carolynne M Doherty, David N Herrmann, Henrik Zetterberg, Amanda J Heslegrave, Rhiannon Laban, Alexander M Rossor, Jasper M Morrow, and Mary M Reilly.
    • Department of Neuromuscular Diseases, UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology, London, UK.
    • J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatr. 2024 May 14; 95 (6): 500503500-503.

    BackgroundLower limb muscle magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) obtained fat fraction (FF) can detect disease progression in patients with Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease 1A (CMT1A). However, analysis is time-consuming and requires manual segmentation of lower limb muscles. We aimed to assess the responsiveness, efficiency and accuracy of acquiring FF MRI using an artificial intelligence-enabled automated segmentation technique.MethodsWe recruited 20 CMT1A patients and 7 controls for assessment at baseline and 12 months. The three-point-Dixon fat water separation technique was used to determine thigh-level and calf-level muscle FF at a single slice using regions of interest defined using Musclesense, a trained artificial neural network for lower limb muscle image segmentation. A quality control (QC) check and correction of the automated segmentations was undertaken by a trained observer.ResultsThe QC check took on average 30 seconds per slice to complete. Using QC checked segmentations, the mean calf-level FF increased significantly in CMT1A patients from baseline over an average follow-up of 12.5 months (1.15%±1.77%, paired t-test p=0.016). Standardised response mean (SRM) in patients was 0.65. Without QC checks, the mean FF change between baseline and follow-up, at 1.15%±1.68% (paired t-test p=0.01), was almost identical to that seen in the corrected data, with a similar overall SRM at 0.69.ConclusionsUsing automated image segmentation for the first time in a longitudinal study in CMT, we have demonstrated that calf FF has similar responsiveness to previously published data, is efficient with minimal time needed for QC checks and is accurate with minimal corrections needed.© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2024. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.

      Pubmed     Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…

What will the 'Medical Journal of You' look like?

Start your free 21 day trial now.

We guarantee your privacy. Your email address will not be shared.