• Journal of critical care · Feb 2024

    Multicenter Study Observational Study

    Neuromuscular blockade and oxygenation changes during prone positioning in COVID-19.

    • Thomas C Rollinson, Luke A McDonald, Joleen Rose, Glenn Eastwood, Rahul Costa-Pinto, Lucy Modra, Akinori Maeda, Zoe Bacolas, James Anstey, Samantha Bates, Scott Bradley, Jodi Dumbrell, Craig French, Angaj Ghosh, Kimberley Haines, Tim Haydon, Carol L Hodgson, Jennifer Holmes, Nina Leggett, Forbes McGain, Cara Moore, Kathleen Nelson, Jeffrey Presneill, Hannah Rotherham, Simone Said, Meredith Young, Peinan Zhao, Andrew Udy, NetoAry SerpaASDepartment of Intensive Care, Austin Health, Melbourne, VIC, Australia; Australian and New Zealand Intensive Care Research Centre, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia., Anis Chaba, and Rinaldo Bellomo.
    • Department of Intensive Care, Austin Health, Melbourne, VIC, Australia; Department of Physiotherapy, Austin Health, Melbourne, VIC, Australia; Department of Physiotherapy, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia; Institute for Breathing and Sleep, Melbourne, VIC, Australia. Electronic address: thomas.rollinson@austin.org.au.
    • J Crit Care. 2024 Feb 1; 79: 154469154469.

    PurposeNeuromuscular blockers (NMBs) are often used during prone positioning to facilitate mechanical ventilation in COVID-19 related ARDS. However, their impact on oxygenation is uncertain.MethodsMulti-centre observational study of invasively ventilated COVID-19 ARDS adults treated with prone positioning. We collected data on baseline characteristics, prone positioning, NMB use and patient outcome. We assessed arterial blood gas data during supine and prone positioning and after return to the supine position.ResultsWe studied 548 prone episodes in 220 patients (mean age 54 years, 61% male) of whom 164 (75%) received NMBs. Mean PaO2:FiO2 (P/F ratio) during the first prone episode with NMBs reached 208 ± 63 mmHg compared with 161 ± 66 mmHg without NMBs (Δmean = 47 ± 5 mmHg) for an absolute increase from baseline of 76 ± 56 mmHg versus 55 ± 56 mmHg (padj < 0.001). The mean P/F ratio on return to the supine position was 190 ± 63 mmHg in the NMB group versus 141 ± 64 mmHg in the non-NMB group for an absolute increase from baseline of 59 ± 58 mmHg versus 34 ± 56 mmHg (padj < 0.001).ConclusionDuring prone positioning, NMB is associated with increased oxygenation compared to non-NMB therapy, with a sustained effect on return to the supine position. These findings may help guide the use of NMB during prone positioning in COVID-19 ARDS.Copyright © 2023 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

      Pubmed     Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…

What will the 'Medical Journal of You' look like?

Start your free 21 day trial now.

We guarantee your privacy. Your email address will not be shared.