• Tolulope Awosika, A Daniel Davidar, Andrew M Hersh, Arjun Menta, Carly Weber-Levine, Safwan Alomari, KhanMajid AzizMADepartment of Radiology and Radiological Science, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA., and Nicholas Theodore.
• Department of Neurosurgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
• World Neurosurg. 2024 Feb 1; 182: e344e359e344-e359.

ObjectiveThe differential diagnosis for postoperative back pain is broad, and conventional imaging modalities are not always conclusive. Therefore, we performed a systematic review of the literature and present case studies describing the use of single-photon emission CT (SPECT)/CT or positron emission tomography (PET)/CT in the diagnosis of back pain following spine surgery.MethodsA systematic review was conducted according to PRISMA guidelines across 5 databases. Relevant keywords included PET/CT, bone SPECT/CT, and pseudarthrosis. The studies were assessed for diagnostic accuracy of the imaging technologies.ResultsA total of 2,444 studies were screened, 91 were selected for full-text review, and 21 were ultimately included. Six retrospective studies investigated the use of SPECT/CT with a total sample size of 309 patients. Two of these studies used SPECT/CT to predict screw loosening in over 50% of patients. Eight studies examined the use of 18-fluoride sodium fluoride (18F-NaF) PET/CT. Among these studies, measures of diagnostic accuracy varied but overall demonstrated the ability of 18F-NaF PET/CT to detect screw loosening and pseudarthrosis. Seven studies examined 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) PET/CT and supported its utility in the diagnosis of postoperative infections in the spine.ConclusionsPET/CT and SPECT/CT are useful in the evaluation of postoperative pain of the spine, especially in patients for whom conventional imaging modalities yield inconclusive results. More diagnostic accuracy studies with strong reference standards are needed to compare hybrid imaging to conventional imaging.Copyright © 2023 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

32 keywords...

hide…