-
- Daniele Roberto Giacobbe, Cristina Marelli, Sara Mora, Sabrina Guastavino, Chiara Russo, Giorgia Brucci, Alessandro Limongelli, Antonio Vena, Malgorzata Mikulska, Maryam Tayefi, Stefano Peluso, Alessio Signori, Antonio Di Biagio, Anna Marchese, Cristina Campi, Mauro Giacomini, and Matteo Bassetti.
- Department of Health Sciences (DISSAL), University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy.
- Ann. Med. 2023 Jan 1; 55 (2): 22854542285454.
BackgroundCandidemia is associated with a heavy burden of morbidity and mortality in hospitalized patients. The availability of blood culture results could require up to 48-72 h after blood draw; thus, early treatment decisions are made in the absence of a definite diagnosis.MethodsIn this retrospective study, we assessed the performance of different supervised machine learning algorithms for the early differential diagnosis of candidemia and bacteremia in adult patients on a large dataset automatically extracted within the AUTO-CAND project.ResultsOverall, 12,483 episodes of candidemia (1275; 10%) or bacteremia (11,208; 90%) were included in the analysis. A random forest classifier achieved the best diagnostic performance for candidemia, with sensitivity 0.98 and specificity 0.65 on the training set (true skill statistic [TSS] = 0.63) and sensitivity 0.74 and specificity 0.57 on the test set (TSS = 0.31). Then, the random classifier was trained in the subgroup of patients with available serum β-D-glucan (BDG) and procalcitonin (PCT) values by exploiting the feature ranking learned in the entire dataset. Although no statistically significant differences were observed from the performance measures obtained by employing BDG and PCT alone, the performance measures of the classifier that included the features selected in the entire dataset, plus BDG and PCT, were the highest in most cases.ConclusionsRandom forest classifiers trained on large datasets of automatically extracted data have the potential to improve current diagnostic algorithms for candidemia. However, further development through implementation of automatically extracted clinical features may be necessary to achieve crucial improvements.
Notes
Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
- Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as
*italics*
,_underline_
or**bold**
. - Superscript can be denoted by
<sup>text</sup>
and subscript<sub>text</sub>
. - Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines
1. 2. 3.
, hyphens-
or asterisks*
. - Links can be included with:
[my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
- Images can be included with:
![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
- For footnotes use
[^1](This is a footnote.)
inline. - Or use an inline reference
[^1]
to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document[^1]: This is a long footnote.
.