• Timothy McAleese, Andre McLeod, Cillian Keogh, and James A Harty.
• Department of Trauma and Orthopaedics, Cork University Hospital, Cork, Ireland. Electronic address: timmcaleese@rcsi.ie.
• Injury. 2024 Feb 1; 55 (2): 111185111185.

IntroductionHip fractures have become a major public health priority due to their increasing incidence. Intramedullary (IM) nailing has gained popularity as a surgical technique for managing these fractures. However, comparative studies with extramedullary devices indicate potentially increased mechanical complications associated with IM nailing. Specifically, there have been recent reports of early implant fracture associated with the TFNA system. This study compares the rate of mechanical complications between 3 implants. Secondarily, we analysed the factors associated with implant fracture and all other mechanical complications.MethodsThis retrospective study included 803 IM nails performed between 2008-2021 for the fixation of proximal femur fractures at a level 1 trauma centre. We recorded patient demographics, AO fracture classification, implant specification and intra-operative parameters such as tip-apex distance, Cleveland index, reduction quality, presence of medial calcar integrity, neck-shaft angle. The outcomes analysed included implant fracture, lag screw cut-out, >10 mm backing out, autodynamisation, periprosthetic fracture, non-union at 6 months and time to revision surgery.ResultsThe overall implant fracture rate was 3.1 % (25/803), with no statistically significant difference between the three devices (p = 0.51). The TFNA group included 183 patients with a median follow-up of 1.6 years. The TFNA fracture rate was 2.2 % (4/183) which occurred at 207 +/- 16.66 days post-operatively. The rate of all mechanical complications was 4.9 % in the TFNA group, 12.9 % in the InterTAN group and 17 % in the IMHS group. Non-union (p < 0.001) and increasing lag screw length (p < 0.02) were identified as risk factors for implant fracture and other mechanical complications. The reverse oblique fracture pattern (AO 31 A3.1) was associated with mechanical complications only (p < 0.01). The cumulative survival rates without revision for the TFNA, InterTAN, IMHS groups were 97.8 %, 95.5 % and 87.9 % respectively at 2.5 years.DiscussionThe rates of implant fracture were comparable between the three nailing systems. The TFNA provides effective fixation for proximal femur fractures using a traditional screw without cement augmentation. The TFNA was associated with an overall reduction in mechanical complications compared to the InterTAN and IMHS. Previously reported mechanical complications associated with IM Nails may relate to older device designs.Copyright © 2023 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.

16 keywords...

hide…