• Masahito Kobayashi, Sachiko Hirata, and Takamitsu Fujimaki.
• Department of Neurosurgery, Saitama Medical University, Saitama, Japan.
• Neurosurgery. 2023 Dec 12; 94 (5): 108810941088-94.

Background And ObjectivesTo study the efficacy of irrigation with artificial cerebrospinal fluid (aCSF) for protection of cranial nerves during surgery; the time required for recovery of brainstem auditory-evoked potentials (BAEPs) that would reflect cochlear function was analyzed in comparison with that for saline irrigation.MethodsThis retrospective study included 117 consecutive patients (95 women, mean age 51.5 ± 11.4 year) who underwent microvascular decompression for hemifacial spasm. During surgery, BAEPs were monitored to avoid damage to the auditory pathways. When a delayed latency of >1 ms or a decrease in amplitude of >50% was detected in BAEP wave V, surgical maneuvers were halted, and the operative field was irrigated with saline or aCSF. Saline was used for irrigation in 58 patients and aCSF in the other 59. The time required for BAEP recovery at the first halt in each patient was analyzed, and the results were compared between the groups.ResultsSurgical procedures were interrupted because of BAEP latency delays or decreases in amplitude in 51 of the patients in the saline group and 54 in the aCSF group. In both groups, the latencies and amplitudes recovered significantly with time and both recovered earlier after aCSF irrigation than after saline irrigation. Hearing outcome was not significantly different between 2 groups.ConclusionaCSF is effective for protection of cochlear nerve and promotes recovery from transient dysfunction during surgery. The protective effect may be attributed to multiple factors including conditioned pH, electrolyte composition, glucose, and microelements, such as magnesium and phosphate.Copyright © 2023 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of the Congress of Neurological Surgeons.

13 keywords...

hide…