• Yifan Wang, Jingguo Hu, Yu Sun, and Yusong Lu.
• Department of Thoracic Surgery, Affiliated Hospital of Chengdu University, Chengdu, China.
• Medicine (Baltimore). 2023 Dec 8; 102 (49): e36503e36503.

BackgroundMicropapillary and solid patterns indicate worse survival in lung adenocarcinoma patients, even in pathological stage IB patients. However, whether the presence of micropapillary or solid components is related to worse prognosis in pathological IA stage lung adenocarcinoma remains unclear.MethodsSeveral databases were searched up to December 31, 2022 for relevant studies investigating the association between micropapillary and solid components and the survival of IA stage lung adenocarcinoma patients. Primary and secondary outcomes are disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS), respectively. Hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confident intervals (CIs) were combined, and subgroup analysis stratified by the pathological subtype and proportion of components was further performed.ResultsA total of 19 studies with 12,562 cases were included. Pooled results indicated that micropapillary or solid components obviously predicted worse DFS (HR = 2.40, 95% CI: 1.96-2.94, P < .001) and OS (HR = 2.30, 95% CI: 1.68-3.15, P < .001). Subgroup analysis based on pathological subtype showed that both micropapillary and solid components were significantly associated with worse DFS (micropapillary: HR = 2.70, 95% CI: 1.70-4.28, P < .001; solid: HR = 3.98, 95% CI: 2.10-7.54, P < .001) and OS (micropapillary: HR = 2.29, 95% CI: 1.17-4.48, P = .015; solid: HR = 4.18, 95% CI: 1.72-10.17, P = .002). In addition, further subgroup analysis stratified by the proportion of micropapillary and solid components (>5%/1% or predominant) showed similar results.ConclusionMicropapillary and solid patterns predicted a significantly worse prognosis in pathological IA stage lung adenocarcinoma patients.Copyright © 2023 the Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc.

17 keywords...

hide…