• Nikola Anusic and Daniel I Sessler.
• Department of Outcomes Research, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA.
• Curr Opin Anaesthesiol. 2024 Feb 1; 37 (1): 495449-54.

Purpose Of ReviewThis review examines advances in clinical trial methodologies relevant to cardiac anesthesia. It focuses on innovative approaches, including factorial randomization, composite outcomes, and cluster randomized trials, which enhance the efficiency, practical relevance, and generalizability of trial outcomes.Recent FindingsFactorial randomization is becoming popular because the approach allows investigators to simultaneously evaluate two or more interventions. Furthermore, factorial designs can evaluate interactions among treatments which is highly relevant information that cannot be obtained from separate trials. Composite outcomes are also increasingly utilized, combining multiple individual outcomes into a single measure, which increases statistical power and can better represent relevant physiology. Designing valid composites requires careful consideration of component outcome severity and incidence. Cluster randomized trials, including stepped wedge and multiple crossover designs, address the challenges of group-level effects and shared environments.SummaryThe evolution of clinical trial designs is marked by a shift towards methodologies that enhance efficiency and provide more nuanced insights into treatment effects. These include factorial designs for simultaneous intervention assessment, composite outcomes for comprehensive physiological representation, and cluster trials for group-level effect analysis. Such advancements are shaping the future of clinical research, making it more relevant, efficient, and broadly applicable.Copyright © 2023 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.

17 keywords...

hide…