• Minghao Teng, Minshu Wang, Feng He, Wu Liang, and Guisheng Zhang.
• Department of Neurosurgery, Minda Hospital of Hubei Minzu University, Enshi, Hubei, China; Hubei Provincial Key Laboratory of Occurrence and Intervention of Rheumatic Diseases, Enshi, Hubei, China; Hubei Provincial Clinical Medical Research Center for Nephropathy, Enshi, Hubei, China.
• World Neurosurg. 2024 Feb 1; 182: e702e711e702-e711.

BackgroundCurrently, arterial spin labeling (ASL) and amide proton transfer (APT) imaging have shown potential for distinguishing glioblastoma from brain metastases. Thus, a meta-analysis was conducted to investigate this further.MethodsAn extensive and comprehensive search was conducted in 6 English and Chinese databases according to predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria, encompassing data up to July 2023. Data from eligible literature were extracted, and bivariate models were employed to calculate pooled sensitivities, specificity, positive likelihood ratio (PLR), negative likelihood ratio (NLR), diagnostic odds ratio (DOR), and area under the curve (AUC) of the summary receiver operating characteristic curve.ResultsThe meta-analysis included 11 articles. For ASL, the pooled sensitivity was 0.77 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.63-0.87), and the pooled specificity was 0.87 (95% CI, 0.77-0.93). The pooled PLR was 5.89 (95% CI, 2.97-11.69), the pooled NLR was 0.26 (95% CI, 0.15-0.47), the pooled DOR was 22.33 (95% CI, 6.89-72.34), and AUC was 0.90 (95% CI, 0.87-0.92). For APT imaging, the pooled sensitivity was 0.78 (95% CI, 0.70-0.85), and the pooled specificity was 0.86 (95% CI, 0.77-0.92). The pooled PLR was 5.51 (95% CI, 3.24-9.37), the pooled NLR was 0.25 (95% CI, 0.17-0.37), the pooled DOR was 21.99 (95% CI, 10.28-47.03), and the AUC was 0.90 (95% CI, 0.87-0.92).ConclusionsThis meta-analysis suggest that both ASL and APT imaging exhibit high accuracy in distinguishing between glioblastoma and brain metastasis.Copyright © 2023 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

21 keywords...

hide…