• Benjamin M Hardy, Adrian Varghese, Megan J Adams, Natalie Enninghorst, and Zsolt J Balogh.
• Department of Traumatology, John Hunter Hospital and University of Newcastle, Newcastle, NSW, 2310, Australia.
• Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2024 Aug 1; 50 (4): 130513121305-1312.

BackgroundThis systematic review aimed to describe the outcomes of the most severely injured polytrauma patients and identify the consistent Injury Severity Score based definition of utilised for their definition. This could provide a global standard for trauma system benchmarking.MethodsThe Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) checklist was applied to this review. We searched Medline, Embase, Cochrane Reviews, CINAHL, CENTRAL from inception until July 2022. Case reports were excluded. Studies in all languages that reported the outcomes of adult and paediatric patients with an ISS 40 and above were included. Abstracts were screened by two authors and ties adjudicated by the senior author.Results7500 abstracts were screened after excluding 13 duplicates. 56 Full texts were reviewed and 37 were excluded. Reported ISS groups varied widely between the years 1986 and 2022. ISS groups reported ranged from 40-75 up to 51-75. Mortality varied between 27 and 100%. The numbers of patients in the highest ISS group ranged between 15 and 1451.ConclusionsThere are very few critically injured patients reported during the last 48 years. The most critically injured polytrauma patients still have at least a 50% risk of death. There is no consistent inclusion and exclusion criteria for this high-risk cohort. The current approach to reporting is not suitable for monitoring the epidemiology and outcomes of the critically injured polytrauma patients.Level Of EvidenceLevel 4-systematic review of level 4 studies.© 2023. The Author(s).

12 keywords...

hide…