• Medicine · Dec 2023

    Observational Study

    Renal angina index in critically ill children as an applicable and reliable tool in the prediction of severe acute kidney injury: Two tertiary centers' prospective observational study from the Middle East.

    • Ahmed S A Soliman, Hamdan S Al-Ghamdi, Mohamed W Abukhatwah, Nagla M Kamal, Shaheen A Dabour, Soha A Elgendy, Jaber Alfaifi, Omar M W Abukhatwah, Salma A S Abosabie, Sara A Abosabie, Mohammed A M Oshi, Jwaher Althobaity, Hanan Sakr Sherbiny, Futun A Al-Juaid, and Eman G Abdel Rahman.
    • Pediatric Department, Faculty of Medicine, Benha University, Egypt.
    • Medicine (Baltimore). 2023 Dec 22; 102 (51): e36713e36713.

    AbstractAcute kidney damage (AKI) is a common cause of pediatric intensive care unit (PICU) admissions. Implementing a reno-protective strategy for AKI prediction can significantly enhance outcomes. The renal angina index (RAI) is a risk stratification tool used to predict severe AKI. We aim to assess the reliability and accuracy of the RAI scoring system in predicting AKI as compared to other conventional AKI markers. A prospective, observational study was conducted in the PICU of 2 tertiary medical centers in the Middle East. A total of 446 patients, aged 1-month to 14-years, without chronic kidney disease were enrolled. The RAI was calculated using the renal risk and renal injury score within the first 8 to 12 hours of admission. The accuracy of RAI was compared to changes in serum creatinine from baseline. The outcome was assessed on Day 3 for presence of AKI according to the kidney disease improving global outcome (KDIGO) criteria and associated sequelae. A positive RAI (RA+) was defined as RAI readings ≥ 8. Among the patients, 89 (19.9%) had a positive RAI within the first 8 to 12 hours of admission. The RA + group had a significantly higher occurrence of Day 3 severe AKI (KDIGO stages 2&3) compared to the RA- group (60.6% vs 4.2%, P < .001). The RA + group also had a significantly higher utilization of renal replacement therapy (RRT) (21.3% vs 1.1%, P < .001), longer mean PICU length of stay in days (11.1 ± 3.5 vs 5.5 ± 2.1, P < .001), and increased mortality (31.4% vs 2.8%, P < .001) compared to the RA- group. The RAI score demonstrated superior predictive ability for Day 3 AKI, with a sensitivity of 72%, specificity of 95%, and area under the curve (AUC) of 0.837, compared to changes in serum creatinine from baseline (sensitivity: 65%, specificity: 89%, AUC: 0.773), fluid overload (sensitivity: 43.7%, specificity: 79%, AUC: 0.613), and illness severity scores (sensitivity: 52.4%, specificity: 80.5%, AUC: 0.657). RAI proved to be a reliable and rapid bedside test for identifying critically ill children at risk of developing severe AKI. This enables physicians to implement reno-protective measures and intervene early, thereby improving prognosis.Copyright © 2023 the Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc.

      Pubmed     Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…