• Thymen Houwen, VerhofstadMichael H JMHJTrauma Research Unit Erasmus Medical Center, Department of Surgery, Erasmus MC University Rotterdam, 3000 CA Rotterdam, the Netherlands., Pim W van Egmond, Manon Enting, LansinkKoen W WKWWDepartment of Surgery, Elisabeth-TweeSteden Ziekenhuis, Tilburg, the Netherlands., and de JonghMariska A CMACNetwork Emergency Care Brabant, Elisabeth-TweeSteden Hospital, Hilvarenbeekseweg 60, 5022 GC, Tilburg, the Netherlands..
• Network Emergency Care Brabant, Elisabeth-TweeSteden Hospital, Hilvarenbeekseweg 60, 5022 GC, Tilburg, the Netherlands; Trauma Research Unit Erasmus Medical Center, Department of Surgery, Erasmus MC University Rotterdam, 3000 CA Rotterdam, the Netherlands. Electronic address: t.houwen@etz.nl.
• Injury. 2024 Mar 1; 55 (3): 111278111278.

IntroductionThe incidence of patients with fractures is increasing and so is the impact on health care systems and society. To improve patient care, measurement of disabilities and impaired health experiences after traumatic musculoskeletal injuries are important. Next to objective clinical parameters, PROM(I)S can be used to map health domains important to patients. We aimed to objectify different aspects of (health-related) quality of life in fracture patients, including the ability to participate in social roles and activities using PROMIS among other PROMs.MethodsAn observational cohort study was performed in which health-related quality of life in fracture patients was measured. Patients aged 18 year and older either treated conservatively or surgically between November 2020 and June 2022 were included. Participants were followed for a maximum of one year and completed the following PROMs: PROMIS-CAT physical function, PROMIS-CAT pain interference, PROMIS-CAT ability to participate in social roles and activities and LEFS or QDASH. We applied a univariate linear mixed model to evaluate significance of improvement.ResultsSeven hundred-forty six patients with a mean age of 54.4 years were included. Mean PROMIS scores were structurally inferior in the lower extremity (LE) fracture group in comparison with the upper extremity (UE) fracture group. For "PROMIS physical function", UE fracture patients performed better and showed physical progression earlier. For "PROMIS pain interference", UE fracture patients experienced fewer limitations, but it took longer to experience improvement in this group. For "PROMIS ability to participate in social roles", significant improvement was only seen in the UE fracture group at one year follow up.ConclusionUpper -and lower extremity fractures can have a significant impact on physical function and social health. Patients with UE fractures tend to have fewer limitations compared to LE fracture patients. Physical function and pain interference is most impaired shortly after the injury in all fracture patients and show significant changes over time, social health improves less over time. Moment of measurement should be based on type of fracture and can differ between individual patients, but when generic measures and outcomes are desirable, PROMIS questionnaires can potentially be used measurement.Copyright © 2023. Published by Elsevier Ltd.

16 keywords...

hide…