• William Wk To and Quality Assurance Subcommittee in Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Hospital Authority, Hong Kong.
• Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, United Christian Hospital, Kwun Tong, Hong Kong. towkw@ha.org.hk
• Hong Kong Med J. 2007 Jun 1;13(3):208-15.

ObjectivesTo evaluate patient attitudes about epidural services in labour and correlate them with patient options and actual usage of epidural analgesia.DesignQuestionnaire survey.SettingEight Hospital Authority obstetrics units.ParticipantsA cohort of new antenatal patients and a cohort of postnatal in-patients over 1 calendar month.Main Outcome MeasuresAntenatal patient awareness of epidural services and attitudes towards epidural analgesia during labour; the actual usage of such analgesia and the reported experience of postnatal patients.ResultsA total of 2109 and 2851 patients completed the antenatal and postnatal survey, respectively. The former revealed that only 47% of patients had been exposed to the concept of epidural analgesia in labour, and only 13% opted for such analgesia. In the postnatal cohort, the overall epidural analgesia rate was 10%, although 19% had actually requested it. Patients who received epidural analgesia in labour were more likely to consider their experience as favourable (85%) compared to those who went through labour without such analgesia (26%) [P<0.001]. There was no significant improvement in knowledge about epidural analgesia among postnatal as compared to antenatal patients. The main reasons generally ascribed by patients for not being able to obtain an epidural service despite it being requested, were related to limited resources.ConclusionThe results showed poor general awareness of pregnant women about the proper role of epidural analgesia in labour, leading to a low patient demand for such services. Despite the low prevailing request rate for epidural analgesia in labour, there appears to be a lack of adequate resources to meet the demand.

24 keywords...

hide…