• Nesia A Zurek, Reza Ehsanian, Aleyah E Goins, Ian M Adams, Timothy Petersen, Sachin Goyal, Mark Shilling, Karin N Westlund, and Sascha R A Alles.
• Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, University of New Mexico Health Sciences Center, Albuquerque, New Mexico.
• J Pain. 2024 Jun 1; 25 (6): 104451104451.

AbstractHuman induced pluripotent stem cell-derived sensory neurons (hiPSC-SNs) and human dorsal root ganglia neurons (hDRG-N) are popular tools in the field of pain research; however, few groups make use of both approaches. For screening and analgesic validation purposes, important characterizations can be determined of the similarities and differences between hDRG-N and hiPSC-SNs. This study focuses specifically on the electrophysiology properties of hDRG-N in comparison to hiPSC-SNs. We also compared hDRG-N and hiPSC-SNs from both male and female donors to evaluate potential sex differences. We recorded neuronal size, rheobase, resting membrane potential, input resistance, and action potential waveform properties from 83 hiPSCs-SNs (2 donors) and 108 hDRG-N neurons (8 donors). We observed several statistically significant electrophysiological differences between hDRG-N and hiPSC-SNs, such as size, rheobase, input resistance, and several action potential waveform properties. Correlation analysis also revealed many properties that were positively or negatively correlated, some of which were differentially correlated between hDRG-N and hiPSC-SNs. This study shows several differences between hDRG-N and hiPSC-SNs and allows a better understanding of the advantages and disadvantages of both for use in pain research. We hope this study will be a valuable resource for pain researchers considering the use of these human in vitro systems for mechanistic studies and/or drug development projects. PERSPECTIVE: hiPSC-SNs and hDRG-N are popular tools in the field of pain research. This study allows for a better functional understanding of the pros and cons of both tools.Copyright © 2024 United States Association for the Study of Pain, Inc. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

27 keywords...

hide…