• Lynsey Warwick-Giles, Joseph Hutchinson, Kath Checkland, Jonathan Hammond, Donna Bramwell, Simon Bailey, and Matt Sutton.
• Centre for Primary Care and Health Services Research, University of Manchester, Manchester.
• Br J Gen Pract. 2024 May 1; 74 (742): e290e299e290-e299.

BackgroundSignificant health inequalities exist in England. Primary care networks (PCNs), comprised of GP practices, were introduced in England in 2019 with funding linked to membership. PCNs have been tasked with tackling health inequalities.AimTo consider how the design and introduction of PCNs might influence their ability to tackle health inequalities.Design And SettingA sequential mixed-methods study of PCNs in England.MethodLinear regression of annual PCN-allocated funding per workload-weighted patient on income deprivation score from 2019-2023 was used. Qualitative interviews and observations of PCNs and PCN staff were undertaken across seven PCN sites in England (July 2020-March 2022).ResultsAcross 1243 networks in 2019-2020, a 10% higher level of income deprivation resulted in £0.31 (95% confidence interval [CI] = £0.25 to £0.37), 4.50%, less funding per weighted patient. In 2022-2023, the same difference in deprivation resulted in £0.16 (95% CI = £0.11 to £0.21), 0.60%, more funding. Qualitative interviews highlighted that, although there were requirements for PCNs to tackle health inequalities, the policy design, and PCN internal relationships and maturity, shaped and sometimes restricted how PCNs approached this task locally.ConclusionAllocated PCN funding has become more pro-poor over time, suggesting that the need to account for deprivation within funding models is understood by policymakers. The following additional approaches have been highlighted that could support PCNs to tackle inequalities: better management support; encouragement and support to redistribute funding internally to support practices serving more deprived populations; and greater specificity in service requirements.© The Authors.

15 keywords...

hide…