• Mariam Ishaque, Shayan Moosa, Lori Urban, Bijoy Kundu, Zoraiz Qureshi, Tyler Spears, P Thomas Fletcher, Joseph Donahue, Sohil H Patel, Robert B Goldstein, Patrick H Finan, Chang-Chia Liu, and W Jeffrey Elias.
• Departments of1Neurological Surgery.
• J. Neurosurg. 2024 Jun 1; 140 (6): 179918091799-1809.

ObjectiveMedial thalamotomy has been shown to benefit patients with neuropathic pain, but widespread adoption of this procedure has been limited by reporting of clinical outcomes in studies without a control group. This study aimed to minimize confounders associated with medial thalamotomy for treating chronic pain by using modern MRI-guided stereotactic lesioning and a rigorous clinical design.MethodsThis prospective, double-blinded, randomized controlled trial in 10 patients with trigeminal neuropathic pain used sham procedures as controls. Participants underwent assessments by a pain psychologist and pain management clinician, including use of the following measures: the Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS); patient-reported outcome measures; and patient's impression of improvement at baseline, 1 day, 1 week, 1 month, and 3 months postprocedure. Patients in the treated group underwent bilateral focused ultrasound (FUS) medial thalamotomy targeting the central lateral nucleus. Patients in the control group underwent sham procedures with energy output disabled. The primary efficacy outcome measure was between-group differences in pain intensity (using the NPRS) at baseline and at 3 months postprocedure. Adverse events were measured for safety and included MRI analysis. Exploratory measures of connectivity and metabolism were analyzed using diffusion tensor imaging, functional MRI, and PET, respectively.ResultsThere were no serious complications from the FUS procedures. MRI confirmed bilateral medial thalamic ablations. There was no significant improvement in pain intensity from baseline to 3 months, either for patients undergoing FUS medial thalamotomy or for sham controls; and the between-group change in NPRS score as the primary efficacy outcome measure was not significantly different. Patient-reported outcome assessments demonstrated improvement (i.e., a decrease) only in pain interference with enjoyment of life at 3 months. There was a perception of benefit at 1 week, but only for patients treated with FUS and not for the sham cohort. Advanced neuroimaging showed that these medial thalamic lesions altered structural connectivity with the postcentral gyrus and demonstrated a trend toward hypometabolism in the insula and amygdala.ConclusionsThis randomized controlled trial of bilateral FUS medial thalamotomy did not reduce the intensity of trigeminal neuropathic pain, although it should be noted that the ability to estimate the magnitude of treatment effects is limited by the small cohort.

23 keywords...

hide…