• Milagros Galecio-Castillo, Michael Abraham, Mudassir Farooqui, Ameer E Hassan, Afshin A Divani, Mouhammad A Jumaa, Marc Ribo, Nils Petersen, Johanna Fifi, Waldo R Guerrero, Amer M Malik, James E Siegler, Thanh N Nguyen, Sunil A Sheth, Albert J Yoo, Guillermo Linares, Nazli Janjua, Darko Quispe-Orozco, Abid Qureshi, Wondwossen G Tekle, Asad Ikram, Syed F Zaidi, Cynthia B Zevallos, Belen Taborda, Alex Devarajan, Linda Zhang, Mohamad Abdalkader, Sergio Salazar-Marioni, Jazba Soomro, Weston Gordon, Aaron Rodriguez-Calienes, Juan Vivanco-Suarez, Katrina Woolfolk, Maxim Mokin, Dileep R Yavagal, and Santiago Ortega-Gutierrez.
• 1Department of Neurology, University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, Iowa City, Iowa.
• J. Neurosurg. 2024 Jun 1; 140 (6): 172617351726-1735.

ObjectiveThe optimal technique for treating tandem lesions (TLs) with endovascular therapy is debatable. The authors evaluated the functional, safety, and procedural outcomes of different approaches in a multicenter study.MethodsAnterior circulation TL patients treated from January 2015 to December 2020 were divided on the basis of antegrade versus retrograde approach and included. The evaluated outcomes were favorable modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score (mRS score 0-2) at 3 months, ordinal shift in mRS score, successful recanalization, excellent recanalization, first-pass effect (FPE), time from groin puncture to successful recanalization, symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH), and 90-day mortality.ResultsAmong 691 patients treated at 16 centers, 286 patients (174 antegrade and 112 retrograde approach patients) with acute stenting were included in the final analysis. There were no significant differences in mRS score 0-2 at 90 days (52.2% vs 50.0%, adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 0.83, 95% CI 0.42-1.56, p = 0.54), favorable shift in 90-day mRS score (aOR 1.03, 95% CI 0.66-1.29, p = 0.11), sICH (4.0% vs 4.5%, aOR 0.64, 95% CI 0.24-1.51, p = 0.45), successful recanalization (89.4% vs 93%, aOR 0.49, 95% CI 0.19-1.28, p = 0.19), excellent recanalization (51.4% vs 58.9%, aOR 0.59, 95% CI 0.40-1.07, p = 0.09), FPE (58.3% vs 69.7%, aOR 0.62, 95% CI 0.44-1.15, p = 0.21), and mortality at 90 days (16.6% vs 14.0%, aOR 0.94, 95% CI 0.35-2.44, p = 0.81) between the groups. The median (interquartile range) groin puncture to recanalization time was significantly longer in the antegrade group (59 [43-90] minutes vs 49 [35-73] minutes, p = 0.036).ConclusionsThe retrograde approach was associated with faster recanalization times with a similar functional and safety profile when compared with the antegrade approach in patients with acute ischemic stroke with TL.

20 keywords...

hide…