• Marianne Jensen Hjermstad, Aleksandra Pirnat, Nina Aass, Sigve Andersen, Guro L Astrup, Olav Dajani, Herish Garresori, Kristin V Guldhav, Hanne Hamre, Ellinor C Haukland, Frode Jordal, Tonje Lundeby, Erik Torbjorn Løhre, Svein Mjåland, Ørnulf Paulsen, Karin A Semb, Erik S Staff, Torunn Wester, and Stein Kaasa.
• Regional Advisory Unit in Palliative Care, Department of Oncology, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.
• Palliat Med. 2024 Feb 1; 38 (2): 229239229-239.

BackgroundEffects on anticancer therapy following the integration of palliative care and oncology are rarely investigated. Thus, its potential effect is unknown.AimTo investigate the effects of the complex intervention PALLiON versus usual care on end-of-life anticancer therapy.DesignCluster-randomised controlled trial (RCT), registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (No. NCT03088202). The complex intervention consisted of a physician education program enhancing theoretical, clinical and communication skills, a patient-centred care pathway and patient symptom reporting prior to all consultations. Primary outcome was overall use, start and cessation of anticancer therapy in the last 3 months before death. Secondary outcomes were patient-reported outcomes. Mixed effects logistic regression models and Cox proportional hazard were used.SettingA total of 12 Norwegian hospitals (03/2017-02/2021).ParticipantsPatients ⩾18 years, advanced stage solid tumour, starting last line of anticancer therapy, estimated life expectancy ⩽12 months.ResultsA total of 616 (93%) patients were included (intervention: 309/control:307); 63% males, median age 69, 77% had gastrointestinal cancers. Median survival time from inclusion was 8 (IQR 3-14) and 7 months (IQR 3-12), and days between anticancer therapy start and death were 204 (90-378) and 168 (69-351) (intervention/control). Overall, 78 patients (13%) received anticancer therapy in the last month (intervention: 33 [11%]/control: 45 [15%]). No differences were found in patient-reported outcomes.ConclusionWe found no significant differences in the probability of receiving end-of-life anticancer therapy. The intervention did not have the desired effect. It was probably too general and too focussed on communication skills to exert a substantial influence on conventional clinical practice.

14 keywords...

hide…