• Joey F H Reijmer, Lex D de Jong, Diederik H R Kempen, Mark P Arts, and van SusanteJob L CJLCDepartment of Orthopaedics, Rijnstate Hospital, Arnhem, The Netherlands..
• Department of Orthopaedics, Rijnstate Hospital, Arnhem, The Netherlands.
• Spine. 2024 Nov 1; 49 (21): E355E360E355-E360.

Study DesignA prospective single-arm clinical study.ObjectiveTo explore the clinical utility of an intervertebral motion metric by determining the proportion of patients for whom it changed their surgical treatment plan from decompression only to decompression with fusion or vice versa .Summary Of Background DataLumbar spinal stenosis from degenerative spondylolisthesis is commonly treated with decompression only or decompression with additional instrumented fusion. An objective diagnostic tool capable of establishing abnormal motion between lumbar vertebrae to guide decision-making between surgical procedures is needed. To this end, a metric based on the vertebral sagittal plane translation-per-degree-of-rotation calculated from flexion-extension radiographs was developed.Materials And MethodsFirst, spine surgeons documented their intended surgical plan. Subsequently, the participants' flexion-extension radiographs were taken. From these, the translation-per-degree-of-rotation was calculated and reported as a sagittal plane shear index (SPSI). The SPSI metric of the spinal level intended to be treated was used to decide if the intended surgical plan needed to be changed or not.ResultsSPSI was determined for 75 participants. Of these, 51 (68%) had an intended surgical plan of decompression only and 24 (32%) had decompression with fusion. In 63% of participants, the SPSI was in support of their intended surgical plan. For 29% of participants, the surgeon changed the surgical plan after the SPSI metric became available to them. A suggested change in the surgical plan was overruled by 8% of participants. The final surgical plan was decompression only for 59 (79%) participants and decompression with fusion for 16 (21%) participants.ConclusionThe 29% change in intended surgical plans suggested that SPSI was considered by spine surgeons as an adjunct metric in deciding whether to perform decompression only or to add instrumented fusion. This change exceeded the a priori defined 15% considered necessary to show the potential clinical utility of SPSI.Copyright © 2024 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc.

30 keywords...

hide…