• Cochrane Db Syst Rev · Jul 2007

    Review

    WITHDRAWN: Very tight versus tight control for diabetes in pregnancy.

    • S A Walkinshaw.
    • Liverpool Women's NHS Foundation Trust, Fetal Centre, Crown Street, Liverpool, UK, L8 7SS. steve.walkinshaw@lwh.nhs.uk
    • Cochrane Db Syst Rev. 2007 Jul 18; 2006 (2): CD000226CD000226.

    BackgroundPregnancies complicated by pre-existing insulin dependent diabetes are high risk for a number of poor pregnancy and neonatal outcomes.ObjectivesThe objective of this review was to assess the effects of very tight glycaemic control in established insulin dependence.Search StrategyThe Cochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth Group trials register was searched.Selection CriteriaRandomised trials comparing very tight with tight control of diabetes in pregnancy.Data Collection And AnalysisOne reviewer assessed trial quality and extracted data.Main ResultsTwo trials involving 182 women were involved. The two trials were difficult to compare. Maternal hypoglycaemia was more common among women whose diabetic control was very tight compared to tight control (odds ratio 25.96, 95% confidence interval 4.91 to 137.26) based on one trial. There was no difference detected in perinatal outcome between the groups.Authors' ConclusionsThere appears to be no clear evidence of benefit from very tight glycaemic control for pregnant diabetic women. Since very strict control may have a substantial impact on lifestyle, this suggests caution in advising such a degree of control.

      Pubmed     Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…

Want more great medical articles?

Keep up to date with a free trial of metajournal, personalized for your practice.
1,694,794 articles already indexed!

We guarantee your privacy. Your email address will not be shared.