• Chang-Ming Li, Shi-Jie Zhao, Jian-Zhu Xu, Qiang Li, Ren-Fu Quan, and Xiao-Mei Deng.
• Department of Orthopaedics Institute, Xiaoshan Traditional Chinese Medical Hospital, XiaoShan District, Hangzhou, Zhejiang Province, China.
• Medicine (Baltimore). 2023 Dec 29; 102 (52): e36807e36807.

AbstractHere we assessed the accuracy of O-arm navigation assisted by Wiltse approach to improve based pedicle screw insertion in ankylosing spondylitis combined with thoracolumbar fractures. We then compared it with the freehand pedicle screw insertion technique. The study sample included 32 patients with ankylosing spondylitis combined with thoracolumbar fractures. Pedicle screw reduction and internal fixation was performed under an O-arm navigation system assisted by a Wiltse approach-combined osteotomy ("navigation group," n = 17) and posterior pedicle screw reduction and internal fixation was performed using freehand technique combined osteotomy ("freehand group," n = 15). We then compared the operation time and bleeding volume between the 2 groups. The visual analog scale (VAS) and Oswestry disability index (ODI) were then used to evaluate the clinical efficacy and the kyphosis Cobb angle was used to evaluate the radiological efficacy before operation, 3 days after operation and after the last follow-up. All complications were noted when detected. Finally, classification of screw positions as proposed by Neo et al was used to evaluate the relationship of the position between the screw, the bone cortex, and the incidence of screw penetration. All patients were followed up for 18 to 36 months (i.e., 24.2 ± 3.5 months). The operation time and intraoperative bleeding volume of the navigation group were significantly shorter (lower) than those of the freehand group (P < .05). In addition, Both groups showed significantly decreased VAS, ODI, and Cobb angle 3 days after the operation and at the last follow-up when compared to values recorded pre-operation. However, we found no significant difference in VAS, ODI, and Cobb angle between the 2 groups (P > .05). We identified no complications (e.g., infection, VTE/PE, or nerve injury). Moreover, the pedicle screw placement position of the navigation group was better than that of the freehand group (P < .05), and the screw cortical penetration rate was lower than the freehand group (P < .05). During the process of posterior pedicle screw placement, O-arm navigation assisted by the Wiltse approach can significantly reduce operation time, minimize the amount of bleeding volume, and enhance the accuracy of pedicle screw implantation.Copyright © 2023 the Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc.

32 keywords...

hide…