• Resuscitation · Jun 2010

    Prognostic value of the calling criteria in patients receiving a medical emergency team review.

    • Márcio Manozzo Boniatti, Neusa Azzolini, Deisi Letícia Oliveira da Fonseca, Berenice Severino Pinto Ribeiro, Vanessa Martins de Oliveira, Rodrigo Kappel Castilho, Marcelo Gregório Raymundi, Renata Souza Coelho, and Edison Moraes Rodrigues Filho.
    • Santa Casa de Misericórdia de Porto Alegre, Brazil. marciobt@terra.com.br
    • Resuscitation. 2010 Jun 1;81(6):667-70.

    AimTo describe the reasons for medical emergency team (MET) activation, and to verify the association of the MET score with 30-day mortality.MethodsThis retrospective observational study took place in a 794-bed university-affiliated hospital. The population included all adult admissions reviewed by the MET during the period between January 2007 and June 2008. MET score was defined as the sum of each of the physiological triggers, and score zero was considered the calls made due to concern about the patient, without any physiological alteration.ResultsDuring the period of the study, 1051 calls were generated for 901 patients. Respiratory distress and hypotension accounted for most of MET calls. The triggers that showed an independent association with mortality were threatened airway, systolic blood pressure <90 mmHg, decrease in Glasgow Coma Scale score > or =2 points and respiratory frequency >36 breaths/min. Logistic regression analysis revealed MET score, age, medical patient, documented do not resuscitate orders and MET decision to transfer to the intensive care unit to be significant predictors of 30-day mortality.ConclusionsMET score presents a strong association with 30-day mortality in patients seen on the ward.Copyright 2010 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…