• Stephen Christopher Murphy, Ben Murphy, and Padhraig O'Loughlin.
• Department of Trauma and Orthopaedic Sugery, Cork University Hospital, Cork, Ireland. sfmurphy101@gmail.com.
• Ir J Med Sci. 2024 Jun 1; 193 (3): 132313301323-1330.

AbstractCortical screw fixation across the tibiofibular joint is the mainstay of treatment for syndesmotic injury. Dynamic fixation devices have been developed offering similar advantages to screw fixation in terms of reduction and stability of the syndesmosis. Dynamic fixation may also facilitate a more physiological movement between the tibiofibular joint and thus incur less morbidity. Patient's rehabilitation potential is enhanced and reduces the need for hardware removal. Our systematic review aims to analyse the relevant current literature and compare screw fixation to dynamic fixation in the treatment of syndesmotic injury associated with acute ankle fractures. A literature search was performed on Pubmed and Ovid Medline to find scientific papers relating to syndesmotic fixation in acute ankle fractures. Papers were screened and included dependent on predetermined criteria. Risk of bias was assessed after screening full papers by two independent reviewers. Tables and analysis were made using Microsoft excel. A total of 8 papers with 673 patients were included. We found no functional difference between screw fixation or dynamic fixation groups at final follow-up. Three papers showed statistically significant lower rates of reoperation in the dynamic fixation group. Dynamic fixation may offer lower post operative complications and reoperation rates. Therefore, dynamic fixation may be a beneficial alternative treatment compared to traditionally used syndesmotic screws.© 2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Royal Academy of Medicine in Ireland.

16 keywords...

hide…