-
- McCormickP AidenPA0000-0002-5994-6023National Hepatitis C Treatment Program HSE, Liver Unit, St. Vincent's University Hospital and UCD, Elm Park, Donnybrook, Dublin 4, DO4 T6F4, Ireland. a.mccormick@ucd.ie., Marie O'Grady, Cillian F De Gascun, John S Lambert, Orla Crosbie, Susan McKiernan, Maeve Skelly, Paul Holder, Garry Courtney, Brian Hennessy, Kevin Walsh, Roisin Twohig, Kate Browne, Tessa O'Gorman, Vivion Crowley, Seán J Costelloe, Roz O'Byrne, Elizabeth Whitney, Orla Gildea, and Noreen Montgomery.
- National Hepatitis C Treatment Program HSE, Liver Unit, St. Vincent's University Hospital and UCD, Elm Park, Donnybrook, Dublin 4, DO4 T6F4, Ireland. a.mccormick@ucd.ie.
- Ir J Med Sci. 2024 Jun 1; 193 (3): 125712601257-1260.
BackgroundHepatitis C virus infection is often asymptomatic, and many patients may be unaware they are infected. Community-based, birth cohort screening has been advocated to identify these patients. It has been estimated that 0.7-1% of individuals born between 1965 and 1985 in Ireland are infected. The cost-effectiveness of screening is critically dependent on the population prevalence.AimsThe aim is to determine the community prevalence of hepatitis C virus infection in the birth cohort 1965-1985.MethodsResidual serum samples from blood tests ordered by community general practitioners were anonymised and analysed for the presence of hepatitis C antibody ± antigen. Twelve large general hospitals throughout the country participated.ResultsA total of 14,320 samples were tested, 9347 of which were from the birth cohort 1965-1985. Seventy-two samples were positive for hepatitis C antibody of which 12 were positive for hepatitis C antigen (17%). The overall prevalence of hepatitis C antigen in the birth cohort was 0.09%. A higher prevalence (0.39%) was identified in males in two urban areas of Dublin.ConclusionsHepatitis C virus seroprevalence was much lower than previously estimated. The proportion of antibody positive patients with hepatitis C antigen was also lower than expected suggesting the effects of treatment and/or high spontaneous viral clearance. Universal birth cohort screening is unlikely to be cost-effective. Targeted birth cohort screening in high prevalence areas could be considered.© 2024. The Author(s).
Notes
Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
- Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as
*italics*
,_underline_
or**bold**
. - Superscript can be denoted by
<sup>text</sup>
and subscript<sub>text</sub>
. - Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines
1. 2. 3.
, hyphens-
or asterisks*
. - Links can be included with:
[my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
- Images can be included with:
![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
- For footnotes use
[^1](This is a footnote.)
inline. - Or use an inline reference
[^1]
to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document[^1]: This is a long footnote.
.