• Nikki Bozinoff, Robert A Kleinman, Matthew E Sloan, Mary Clare Kennedy, Seonaid Nolan, Peter Selby, Csilla Kalocsai, and Evan Wood.
• Campbell Family Mental Health Research Institute, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, Toronto, Canada. Nikki.bozinoff@camh.ca.
• J Gen Intern Med. 2024 May 1; 39 (7): 122712321227-1232.

AbstractPhysicians have traditionally asked about substance use within the Social History section of the consultation note. Drawing on social science theory and using the authors' own experiences as generalists and addiction scholars, we consider the possible unintended harms associated with this approach. The inclusion of the substance use history within the Social History reproduces the discourse of substance use disorders as "life-style choices" rather than medical conditions, and reinforces stigma among healthcare workers through the attribution of personal responsibility for complications associated with problematic substance use. The ongoing placement of the substance use history within the Social History may lead to a failure to diagnose and make appropriate management plans for clients with substance use disorders. These missed opportunities may include inadequate withdrawal management leading to discharge before medically advised, insufficient use of evidence-based pharmacotherapy and psychotherapy, polypharmacy, medical complications, and repeated admissions to hospital. We argue instead that the Substance Use History should be a stand-alone section within the consultation note. This new section would reduce the invisibility of substance use disorders within our medical systems and model that these chronic medical conditions are amenable to prevention, treatment and harm reduction through the application of evidence-based practices.© 2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Society of General Internal Medicine.

29 keywords...

hide…