• Nathan Evaniew, Christopher S Bailey, Y Raja Rampersaud, W Bradley Jacobs, Philippe Phan, Andrew Nataraj, David W Cadotte, Michael H Weber, Kenneth C Thomas, Neil Manson, Najmedden Attabib, Jerome Paquet, Sean D Christie, Jefferson R Wilson, Hamilton Hall, Charles G Fisher, Greg McIntosh, and Nicolas Dea.
• University of Calgary Spine Program, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
• Neurosurgery. 2024 Feb 2.

Background And ObjectivesThe advantages and disadvantages of anterior vs posterior surgical approaches for patients with progressive degenerative cervical myelopathy (DCM) remain uncertain. Our primary objective was to evaluate patient-reported disability at 1 year after surgery. Our secondary objectives were to evaluate differences in patient profiles selected for each approach in routine clinical practice and to compare neurological function, neck and arm pain, health-related quality of life, adverse events, and rates of reoperations.MethodsWe analyzed data from patients with DCM who were enrolled in an ongoing multicenter prospective observational cohort study. We controlled for differences in baseline characteristics and numbers of spinal levels treated using multivariable logistic regression. Adverse events were collected according to the Spinal Adverse Events Severity protocol.ResultsAmong 559 patients, 261 (47%) underwent anterior surgery while 298 (53%) underwent posterior surgery. Patients treated posteriorly had significantly worse DCM severity and a greater number of vertebral levels involved. After adjusting for confounders, there was no significant difference between approaches for odds of achieving the minimum clinically important difference for the Neck Disability Index (odds ratio 1.23, 95% CI 0.82 to 1.86, P = .31). There was also no significant difference for change in modified Japanese Orthopedic Association scores, and differences in neck and arm pain and health-related quality of life did not exceed minimum clinically important differences. Patients treated anteriorly experienced greater rates of dysphagia, whereas patients treated posteriorly experienced greater rates of wound complications, neurological complications, and reoperations.ConclusionPatients selected for posterior surgery had worse DCM and a greater number of vertebral levels involved. Despite this, anterior and posterior surgeries were associated with similar improvements in disability, neurological function, pain, and quality of life. Anterior surgery had a more favorable profile of adverse events, which suggests it might be a preferred option when feasible.Copyright © Congress of Neurological Surgeons 2024. All rights reserved.

20 keywords...

hide…