• J Eval Clin Pract · Oct 2024

    A critical evaluation of choice negotiation for patient-centred medicine and psychotherapy.

    • Franco Giorgi, Annibale Fanali, and Francesco Tramonti.
    • University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy.
    • J Eval Clin Pract. 2024 Oct 1; 30 (7): 116911751169-1175.

    Study AimsThe present paper aimed at discussing how the process of decision-making should be taken care of in healthcare services.MethodsThis is a position paper based on a review of the relevant literature about meaning-making processes in medical encounters and psychotherapy.DiscussionAuthors argued that choice options could be perceived as meaningful by patients if their uncertainties were taken into account and grounded on mutual understanding and reciprocal trust. To this end, any decision-making process should satisfy the patient's legitimate expectations by making choices and habits compatible.ConclusionIn depht analysis of meaning-making processes is crucial for better refining good practices of shared decision-making.© 2024 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

      Pubmed     Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…