• CMAJ · Feb 2024

    One-time screening for abdominal aortic aneurysm in Ontario, Canada: a model-based cost-utility analysis.

    • Dominique Vervoort, Grishma Hirode, Thomas F Lindsay, Derrick Y Tam, Varun Kapila, and Charles de Mestral.
    • Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation (Vervoort, Tam, de Mestral), Division of Cardiac Surgery (Vervoort, Tam) and Institute of Medical Science (Hirode), University of Toronto; Toronto Centre for Liver Disease (Hirode), Toronto General Hospital, University Health Network; Division of Vascular Surgery, Department of Surgery (Lindsay), Peter Munk Cardiac Centre, University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ont.; Division of Vascular Surgery (Kapila), William Osler Health System, Brampton, Ont.; Division of Vascular Surgery, Department of Surgery (de Mestral), St. Michael's Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ont.
    • CMAJ. 2024 Feb 4; 196 (4): E112E120E112-E120.

    BackgroundScreening programs for abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) are not available in Canada. We sought to determine the effectiveness and costutility of AAA screening in Ontario.MethodsWe compared one-time ultrasonography-based AAA screening for people aged 65 years to no screening using a fully probabilistic Markov model with a lifetime horizon. We estimated life-years, quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs), AAA-related deaths, number needed to screen to prevent 1 AAA-related death and costs (in Canadian dollars) from the perspective of the Ontario Ministry of Health. We retrieved model inputs from literature, Statistics Canada, and the Ontario Case Costing Initiative.ResultsScreening reduced AAA-related deaths by 84.9% among males and 81.0% among females. Compared with no screening, screening resulted in 0.04 (18.96 v. 18.92) additional life-years and 0.04 (14.95 v. 14.91) additional QALYs at an incremental cost of $80 per person among males. Among females, screening resulted in 0.02 (21.25 v. 21.23) additional life-years and 0.01 (16.20 v. 16.19) additional QALYs at an incremental cost of $11 per person. At a willingness-to-pay of $50 000 per year, screening was cost-effective in 84% (males) and 90% (females) of model iterations. Screening was increasingly cost-effective with higher AAA prevalence.InterpretationScreening for AAA among people aged 65 years in Ontario was associated with fewer AAA-related deaths and favourable cost-effectiveness. To maximize QALY gains per dollar spent and AAA-related deaths prevented, AAA screening programs should be designed to ensure that populations with high prevalence of AAA participate.© 2024 CMA Impact Inc. or its licensors.

      Pubmed     Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…

What will the 'Medical Journal of You' look like?

Start your free 21 day trial now.

We guarantee your privacy. Your email address will not be shared.