• Yuanhu Lei, Juemiao Chen, Zhixuan Liu, Mingjiang Luo, Yuxin Yang, Can Liang, and Zhihong Xiao.
• Department of Joint Surgery, Second Affiliated Hospital, Hengyang Medical School, University of South China, Hengyang City, Hunan Province, China.
• World Neurosurg. 2024 Apr 1; 184: e417e448e417-e448.

ObjectiveThe purpose of this study was to compare the efficacy of the lateral approach and posterior approach in the treatment of lumbar degenerative diseases.MethodsThrough a systematic search of relevant articles published on or before July 20, 2023, in the Embase, PubMed, and Cochrane libraries, the 2 authors independently extracted data and used the Newcastle‒Ottawa scale to evaluate the quality of the included studies. Using Stata16 software, the continuous variables were presented as the standard mean deviation, and the bipartite variables were analyzed using the pooled odds ratio with 95% confidence interval.ResultsA total of 13,892 articles were screened and 10,908 studies were identified after deleting duplicates, of which 41 met the criteria and were included in the meta-analysis. The meta-analysis showed that the lateral approach was superior to the posterior approach in reducing blood loss, operation time, and hospital stay. At the same time, compared with the posterior approach, the lateral approach has more advantages in the long-term Japanese Orthopaedic Association score and Oswestry Disability Index score, adjusting mid- and long-term LL and short- and long-term disc height.ConclusionsLateral and posterior surgery have similar clinical effects in the treatment of lumbar degenerative diseases and can significantly reduce pain and improve postoperative SL. At the same time, the lateral approach has more advantages in improving long-term quality of life, reducing the long-term disability index, adjusting mid- and long-term LL and short- and long-term disc height.Copyright © 2024. Published by Elsevier Inc.

27 keywords...

hide…