• Dianne L Atkins.
• University of Iowa Children's Hospital, University of Iowa, Iowa City, USA. dianne-atkins@uiowa.edu <dianne-atkins@uiowa.edu>
• Curr Opin Crit Care. 2010 Jun 1;16(3):191-5.

Purpose Of ReviewPublic access defibrillation programs have increased dramatically over the past 15 years. This review will focus on their effectiveness and operational characteristics and discuss the characteristics of successful programs, which can improve outcomes.Recent FindingsAutomated external defibrillators increase survival from cardiac arrest when used by a bystander. Recent studies show that the best outcomes are achieved when devices are placed in areas with a high frequency of cardiac arrest and there is ongoing supervision with emergency plans and cardiopulmonary resuscitation training. Programs are cost-effective under these circumstances, but become very inefficient when placed in areas of low risk. There are few adverse events related to the public access defibrillation programs and volunteers are not harmed. Unguided placement results in devices not being used and a decline in organizational structure of the program. As most cardiac arrests occur in the home, the impact on overall survival remains low.SummaryAutomated external defibrillators are highly effective at reducing death from ventricular fibrillation and easy access in public areas is most effective. Placement must be prioritized based on public health impact and characteristics of the community.

14 keywords...

hide…