• World Neurosurg · Apr 2024

    Clinical and surgical outcomes of endoscopic endonasal approach for giant pituitary adenomas: analysis of predictive factors.

    • Aldo Eguiluz-Melendez, Marcos Vinicius Sangrador-Deitos, P Juan Calderón-Yrigoyen, A Luis Rodríguez-Hernández, Y Gerardo Guinto-Nishimura, J Roberto Alcazar-Felix, Silvia Caballero-Delgado, A Lesly Portocarrero-Ortiz, Cristopher Valencia-Ramos, and L Juan Gómez-Amador.
    • Department of Neurological Surgery, Instituto Nacional de Ciencias Médicas y Nutrición Salvador Zubirán, Mexico City, Mexico; Department of Neurological Surgery, Instituto Nacional de Neurología y Neurocirugía Manuel Velasco Suárez, Mexico City, Mexico.
    • World Neurosurg. 2024 Apr 1; 184: e659e673e659-e673.

    BackgroundGiant pituitary adenomas (GPAs) are defined as tumors with ≥40 mm in any maximum diameter, and these tend to invade multiple intracranial compartments. Hence, treatment remains a surgical challenge.ObjectiveTo describe the clinical and surgical outcomes of the endoscopic endonasal approach (EEA) for GPA in a pituitary referral center in Latin America and to analyze associated predictive factors.Methods37 patients with histologically-confirmed GPA treated solely through the EEA between a 2-year period were included. Preoperative and postoperative clinical and neuroimaging findings; surgical morbidity and mortality; and binary logistic regression analysis to assess predictive factors were analyzed.ResultsPreoperative visual impairment prevalence was 97.3%. Mean tumor volume was 32 cc and gross total resection rate was 40.5%. Favorable visual acuity and visual fields outcome rate was 75% and 82.9%, respectively. In the multivariate analysis, bilateral cavernous sinus invasion (P = 0.018) and postoperative cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leak (P = 0.036) were associated with an unfavorable visual acuity outcome, while radiation therapy (P = 0.035) was for visual fields. Similarly, intraoperative CSF leak was a predictive factor for postoperative CSF leak (10.8%) (P = 0.042) and vascular injury (13.5%) (P = 0.048).ConclusionsIn this first Mexican clinical series, we demonstrated that the EEA is a safe and effective technique for GPA, although early diagnosis and prompt intervention may promote further visual function preservation without significant endocrine morbidity.Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

      Pubmed     Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…

What will the 'Medical Journal of You' look like?

Start your free 21 day trial now.

We guarantee your privacy. Your email address will not be shared.