-
Randomized Controlled Trial Clinical Trial
Community action against asthma: examining the partnership process of a community-based participatory research project.
- Edith A Parker, Barbara A Israel, Melina Williams, Wilma Brakefield-Caldwell, Toby C Lewis, Thomas Robins, Erminia Ramirez, Zachary Rowe, and Gerald Keeler.
- Department of Health Behavior and Health Education, University of Michigan School of Public Health, 1420 Washington Heights, Ann Arbor, MI 48109-2029, USA. edithp@umich.edu
- J Gen Intern Med. 2003 Jul 1; 18 (7): 558567558-67.
BackgroundCommunity Action Against Asthma (CAAA) is a community-based participatory research (CBPR) project that assesses the effects of outdoor and indoor air quality on exacerbation of asthma in children, and tests household- and neighborhood-level interventions to reduce exposure to environmental asthma triggers. Representatives of community-based organizations, academia, an integrated health system, and the local health department work in partnership on CAAA's Steering Committee (SC) to design and implement the project.ObjectiveTo conduct a process evaluation of the CAAA community-academic partnership.DesignIn-depth interviews containing open-ended questions were conducted with SC members. Analysis included established methods for qualitative data, including focused coding and constant comparison methods.SettingCommunity setting in Detroit, Michigan.ParticipantsTwenty-three members of the CAAA SC.MeasurementsCommon themes identified by SC members relating to the partnership's ability to achieve project goals and the successes and challenges facing the partnership itself.Main ResultsIdentified partnership accomplishments included: successful implementation of a complex project, identification of children with previously undiagnosed asthma, and diverse participation and community influence in SC decisions. Challenges included ensuring all partners' influence in decision-making, the need to adjust to "a different way of doing things" in CBPR, constraints and costs of doing CBPR felt by all partners, ongoing need for communication and maintaining trust, and balancing the needs of science and the community through intervention.ConclusionsCBPR can enhance and facilitate basic research, but care must be given to trust issues, governance issues, organizational culture, and costs of participation for all organizations involved.
Notes
Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
- Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as
*italics*
,_underline_
or**bold**
. - Superscript can be denoted by
<sup>text</sup>
and subscript<sub>text</sub>
. - Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines
1. 2. 3.
, hyphens-
or asterisks*
. - Links can be included with:
[my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
- Images can be included with:
![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
- For footnotes use
[^1](This is a footnote.)
inline. - Or use an inline reference
[^1]
to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document[^1]: This is a long footnote.
.