• Lingzhong Meng, Mads Rasmussen, Deyi M Meng, Fletcher A White, and Long-Jun Wu.
• From the Department of Anesthesia, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana.
• Anesth. Analg. 2024 Feb 12.

AbstractNeurovascular coupling (NVC) is the mechanism that drives the neurovascular response to neural activation, and NVC dysfunction has been implicated in various neurologic diseases. NVC is driven by (1) nonmetabolic feedforward mechanisms that are mediated by various signaling pathways and (2) metabolic feedback mechanisms that involve metabolic factors. However, the interplay between these feedback and feedforward mechanisms remains unresolved. We propose that feedforward mechanisms normally drive a swift, neural activation-induced regional cerebral blood flow (rCBF) overshoot, which floods the tissue beds, leading to local hypocapnia and hyperoxia. The feedback mechanisms are triggered by the resultant hypocapnia (not hyperoxia), which causes cerebral vasoconstriction in the neurovascular unit that counterbalances the rCBF overshoot and returns rCBF to a level that matches the metabolic activity. If feedforward mechanisms function improperly (eg, in a disease state), the rCBF overshoot, tissue-bed flooding, and local hypocapnia fail to occur or occur on a smaller scale. Consequently, the neural activation-related increase in metabolic activity results in local hypercapnia and hypoxia, both of which drive cerebral vasodilation and increase rCBF. Thus, feedback mechanisms ensure the brain milieu's stability when feedforward mechanisms are impaired. Our proposal integrates the feedforward and feedback mechanisms underlying NVC and suggests that these 2 mechanisms work like a fail-safe system, to a certain degree. We also discussed the difference between NVC and cerebral metabolic rate-CBF coupling and the clinical implications of our proposed framework.Copyright © 2024 International Anesthesia Research Society.

4 keywords...

hide…