• Shannon Satterwhite, NguyenMichelle-Linh TMTDivision of Internal Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.Zuckerberg San Francisco General Hospital, San Francisco, CA, USA., Vlad Honcharov, Aoife M McDermott, and Urmimala Sarkar.
• Department of Family and Community Medicine, UC Davis Health, Sacramento, CA, USA.
• J Gen Intern Med. 2024 Jul 1; 39 (9): 157515821575-1582.

BackgroundThere is growing, widespread recognition that expectations of US primary care vastly exceed the time and resources allocated to it. Little research has directly examined how time scarcity contributes to harm or patient safety incidents not readily capturable by population-based quality metrics.ObjectiveTo examine near-miss events identified by primary care physicians in which taking additional time improved patient care or prevented harm.DesignQualitative study based on semi-structured interviews.ParticipantsTwenty-five primary care physicians practicing in the USA.ApproachParticipants completed a survey that included demographic questions, the Ballard Organizational Temporality Scale and the Mini-Z scale, followed by a one hour qualitative interview over video-conference (Zoom). Iterative thematic qualitative data analysis was conducted.Key ResultsPrimary care physicians identified several types of near-miss events in which taking extra time during visits changed their clinical management. These were evident in five types of patient care episodes: high-risk social situations, high-risk medication regimens requiring patient education, high acuity conditions requiring immediate workup or treatment, interactions of physical and mental health, and investigating more subtle clinical suspicions. These near-miss events highlight the ways in which unreasonably large patient panels and packed schedules impede adequate responses to patient care episodes that are time sensitive and intensive or require flexibility.ConclusionsPrimary care physicians identify and address patient safety issues and high-risk situations by spending more time than allotted for a given patient encounter. Current quality metrics do not account for this critical aspect of primary care work. Current healthcare policy and organization create time scarcity. Interventions to address time scarcity and to measure its prevalence and implications for care quality and safety are urgently needed.© 2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Society of General Internal Medicine.

21 keywords...

hide…