• Julie Patterson, James Motyka, and John Michael O'Brien.
• National Pharmaceutical Council, 1717 Pennsylvania Ave NW, Ste 800, Washington, DC 20006. Email: jpatterson@npcnow.org.
• Am J Manag Care. 2024 Feb 1; 30 (2): 828682-86.

ObjectivesTo describe the clinical development landscape for high-spend Medicare Part D small molecule drugs and illustrate the potential impact of the Inflation Reduction Act of 2022 (IRA) on research and development investments toward subsequent indications.Study DesignDescriptive analysis of research and development time lines of small molecule drugs in the top 50 of 2020 Medicare Part D spending using publicly available dates when pivotal clinical trials were first posted to ClinicalTrials.gov and FDA approval dates for initial and subsequent indications.MethodsWe summarize the drugs, indications, and time lines using descriptive statistics.ResultsThirty of the 50 drugs with highest gross spending by Medicare Part D in 2020 were small molecule drugs with subsequent indications. Subsequent indications based on preapproval research (n = 34) were often approved within 2 years of initial approval (n = 15) and, on average, 2.9 years after a drug's first approval. Additional indications based on postapproval clinical trials or real-world evidence (n = 42) received FDA approval, on average, 7.5 years after a drug was first approved, with the majority (55.8%) receiving FDA approval more than 7 years after the initial approval.ConclusionsOur analysis of clinical development for new indications reveals aspects of innovation in small molecule drugs that are at risk under the IRA. Specifically, the time lines described in this research demonstrate how the IRA may reduce economic incentives to develop multiple indications, including single-indication launches and investments in postapproval research for additional indications.

11 keywords...

hide…