• Tanguy Espejo, Henk B Riedel, Sebastian Messingschlager, Wolfram Sonnleitner, John Kellett, Mikkel Brabrand, Tim Cooksley, Roland Bingisser, and Christian H Nickel.
• Emergency Department, University Hospital Basel, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
• Clin Med (Lond). 2024 Mar 1; 24 (2): 100027100027.

AimTo investigate the predictive value of both mental status, assessed with the AVPUC (Alert, responds to Voice, responds to Pain, Unresponsive, and new Confusion) scale, and mobility assessments, and their interrater reliability (IRR) between triage clinicians and a research team.MethodProspective study of consecutive patients who presented to an ED. Mental status and mobility were assessed by triage clinicians and by a dedicated research team.Results4,191 patients were included. After adjustment for age and sex, patients with altered mental status have an odds ratio of 6.55 [4.09-10.24] to be admitted in the ICU and an odds ratio of 21.16 [12.06-37.01] to die within 30 days; patients with impaired mobility have an odds ratio of 7.08 [4.60-11.12] to be admitted in the ICU and an odds ratio of 12.87 [5.93-32.30] to die within 30 days. The kappa coefficient between triage clinicians and the research team for mental status assessment was 0.75, and 0.80 for mobility.ConclusionAssessment of mental status by the AVPUC scale, and mobility by a simple dichotomous scale are suitable for ED triage. Both altered mental status and impaired mobility are associated with adverse outcomes. Mental status and mobility assessment have good interrater reliability.Copyright © 2024. Published by Elsevier Ltd.

29 keywords...

hide…