• Gamze Yilmaz, Salim Neselioglu, Fatma Ece Aydogdu, Ozcan Erel, Ozlem Uzunlar, and Moraloglu TekinOzlemODepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Republic of Turkey Ministry of Health Ankara City Hospital, Ankara, Turkey..
• Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Republic of Turkey Ministry of Health Ankara City Hospital, Ankara, Turkey.
• J Chin Med Assoc. 2024 Apr 1; 87 (4): 410413410-413.

BackgroundTo evaluate changes in oxidant status using thiol/disulfide homeostasis in mothers and fetuses after induction of labor with slow-release vaginal dinoprostone inserts.MethodsA total of 70 pregnant women were divided into two groups. Thirty-five women in whom labor was induced with slow-release vaginal dinoprostone inserts (10 mg of prostaglandin E2, group A) were compared before and after the administration. The other 35 women, who were followed up spontaneously during labor (group B), were included as a control group. Both groups were diagnosed with isolated oligohydramnios without signs of placental insufficiency. The thiol/disulfide homeostasis parameters were calculated before medical induction and after removal of the insert at the beginning of the active phase of labor. Maternal and cord blood values were measured in both groups.ResultsAlthough the balance shifted to the antioxidant side after the slow-release vaginal dinoprostone insert was applied, there was no significant difference in maternal oxidative load compared to the pre-application status (5.32 ± 014/5.16 ± 0.15, p = 0.491). Despite the shift toward the antioxidant side, maternal antioxidants were still significantly lower in the group that received slow-release vaginal dinoprostone at the beginning of the active phase of labor than in the control group (295.98 ± 13.03/346.47 ± 12.04, respectively, p = 0.009). There was no statistically significant difference in terms of oxidative balance or newborn Apgar score ( p > 0.05).ConclusionInduction of labor with slow-release vaginal dinoprostone inserts in pregnancies with isolated oligohydramnios does not cause further oxidative stress and is safe for both mothers and neonates in terms of oxidant load by thiol/disulfide homeostasis.Copyright © 2024, the Chinese Medical Association.

29 keywords...

hide…