• Michael Page, Dawn Jackson, and Elizabeth Carty.
• Reader in education, Barts and the London Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, Institute of Health Sciences Education, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK. Electronic address: m.page@qmul.ac.uk.
• Clin Med (Lond). 2024 Jan 1; 24 (1): 100003100003.

AbstractSpecialist, associate specialist and specialty (SAS) doctors constitute a marginalised professional group who can struggle to achieve the professional development they desire. Our primary objective was to understand, from a theoretically informed perspective, the ways in which the professional identity of SAS doctors influences their professional development opportunities, including through appraisal. Ten UK SAS doctors participated in in-depth, narrative interviews. Participants were drawn from six medical specialities, and ranged in experience (2.5-15 years) and country of primary medical qualification. Interview transcripts were analysed via critical discourse analysis using Figured Worlds theory. The position of SAS doctors within the Figured World was at times unstable, ambiguous and context dependent. They were often relative outsiders, not immediately trusted by colleagues. Some found their development needs eclipsed by the priorities of colleagues, typically consultants and postgraduate trainees. Appraisal was often not perceived to have successfully addressed these issues. This study enhances our understanding of the lived experience of SAS doctors, which is often in stark contrast to formal policy on the range of roles that they can fulfil. The struggles and successes of SAS doctors described here suggest that there is scope to improve the professional status and professional development opportunities for SAS doctors, including through appraisal.Crown Copyright © 2024. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

7 keywords...

hide…