• Resuscitation · Apr 2009

    Intracerebroventricular application of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor after cardiac arrest does not promote beneficial effects on cerebral recovery after cardiac arrest in rats.

    • Erik Popp, Tobias Rabsahl, Andreas Schneider, Nicolai Russ, Fabian Spöhr, Peter Vogel, Bernd W Böttiger, and Peter Teschendorf.
    • Department of Anaesthesiology, University of Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 110, D-69120 Heidelberg, Germany. erik.popp@uni-heidelberg.de
    • Resuscitation. 2009 Apr 1;80(4):478-83.

    SubjectRecent data demonstrated potent neuroprotective effects of growth hormones such as granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) after focal cerebral ischaemia. In order to assess possible effects of intracerebroventricular application of G-CSF on cerebral recovery after cardiac arrest (CA) in rats, neurological testing and histological analyses were performed.InterventionsAfter 6 min of electrically induced CA, rats were resuscitated (CPR) and divided into two groups (G-CSF vs. placebo) with two different reperfusion times (7 and 14 days). G-CSF (3.84 microg) or placebo was applied 30 min after restoration of spontaneous circulation (ROSC). At 24h, 3, 7, 10 and 14 days, behavioural neurological testing was done (tape removal test, TRT). Neuronal degeneration of the hippocampal CA-1 sector was analyzed by TUNEL- and Nissl-staining.ResultsBefore CA all animals passed the TRT (G-CSF 7 [4-12] s, placebo 9 [6-10] s). After ROSC both groups showed a clear neurological deficit (24h: G-CSF and placebo 180 [180-180] s), that improved with ongoing reperfusion times, without reaching baseline values (14 days: G-CSF 25 [21-59] s, placebo 34 [14-175] s). Survival rates did not differ between the groups. All animals showed massive neurodegeneration histologically without any differences between the groups 7 days after CA (TUNEL-positive: G-CSF 63.2 [53.8-72.1], placebo 72.6 [66.6-82.7]; Nissl-positive: G-CSF 2.5 [1.8-3.4], placebo 2.8 [2.0-5.1]). At 14 days, TUNEL-staining revealed no differences (G-CSF 45.2 [35.0-60.0], placebo 56.0 [37.6-63.4]), while G-CSF treatment led to fewer Nissl-positive neurons (G-CSF 1.5 [1.2-2.2], placebo 3.1 [2.1-4.2]; p=0.011).ConclusionsDespite promising experimental data concerning focal cerebral ischaemia, in this model of 6 min of normothermic CA no beneficial effects of G-CSF application could be demonstrated by behavioural testing and histological analyses of the hippocampal CA-1 sector.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…

Want more great medical articles?

Keep up to date with a free trial of metajournal, personalized for your practice.
1,694,794 articles already indexed!

We guarantee your privacy. Your email address will not be shared.