• Birgit Coucke, Steven De Vleeschouwer, Johannes van Loon, Frank Van Calenbergh, Anaïs Van Hoylandt, Laura Van Gerven, and Tom Theys.
• 1Department of Neurosciences, Research Group Experimental Neurosurgery and Neuroanatomy and the Leuven Brain Institute, KU Leuven.
• J. Neurosurg. 2024 Aug 1; 141 (2): 500508500-508.

ObjectiveCSF leakage is a major complication after cranial surgery, and although fibrin sealants are widely used for reinforcing dural closure, concerns exist regarding their safety, efficacy, and cost. Leukocyte- and platelet-rich fibrin (L-PRF), an autologous platelet concentrate, is readily available and inexpensive, making it a cost-effective alternative for commercially available fibrin sealants. This study aimed to demonstrate the noninferiority of L-PRF compared with commercially available fibrin sealants in preventing postoperative CSF leakage in supra- and infratentorial cranial surgery, with secondary outcomes focused on CSF leakage risk factors and adverse events.MethodsIn a single-blinded, prospective, randomized controlled interventional trial conducted at a neurosurgery department of a tertiary care center (UZ Leuven, Belgium), patients undergoing elective cranial neurosurgery were randomly assigned to receive either L-PRF (active treatment) or commercially available fibrin sealants (control) for dural closure in a 1:1 ratio.ResultsAmong 350 included patients, 328 were analyzed for the primary endpoint (44.5% male, mean age 52.3 ± 15.1 years). Six patients (5 in the control group, 1 in the L-PRF group) presented with CSF leakage requiring any intervention (relative risk [RR] 0.20, one-sided 95% CI -∞ to 1.02, p = 0.11), confirming noninferiority. Of these 6 patients, 1 (in the control group) presented with CSF leakage requiring revision surgery. No risk factors for reconstruction failure in combination with L-PRF were identified. RRs for adverse events such as infection (0.72, 95% CI -∞ to 1.96) and meningitis (0.36, 95% CI -∞ to 1.25) favored L-PRF treatment, although L-PRF treatment showed slightly more bleeding events (1.44, 95% CI -∞ to 4.66).ConclusionsDural reinforcement with L-PRF proved noninferior to commercially available fibrin sealants, with no safety issues. Introducing L-PRF to standard clinical practice could result in important cost savings due to accessibility and lower cost. Clinical trial registration no.: NCT03812120 (ClinicalTrials.gov).

25 keywords...

hide…