• Brain Stimul · Apr 2008

    Randomized Controlled Trial

    Treatment of chronic neuropathic pain by motor cortex stimulation: results of a bicentric controlled crossover trial.

    • Jean-Paul Nguyen, Francisco Velasco, Pierre Brugières, Marcos Velasco, Yves Keravel, Bernardo Boleaga, Francisco Brito, and Jean-Pascal Lefaucheur.
    • Service de Neurochirurgie, Hôpital Henri Mondor, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Créteil, France. jeanpaul.nguyen@chu-nantes.fr
    • Brain Stimul. 2008 Apr 1;1(2):89-96.

    BackgroundChronic motor cortex stimulation (MCS) with surgically implanted epidural electrodes has been proposed as a treatment for neuropathic pain refractory compared with medical treatment. However, no prospective controlled trial has been published to provide convincing evidence of MCS analgesic efficacy.ObjectiveTo compare MCS analgesic efficacy between "ON"- and "OFF"-stimulation conditions in a double-blinded crossover trial.MethodsTen patients with chronic neuropathic pain of either peripheral or central origin underwent MCS implantation in two centers (Créteil, France, and Mexico City, Mexico). At the end of the second postoperative month, patients were randomly assigned into two groups. In the first group, the stimulator was switched "OFF" for two weeks and then was switched "ON" for the next 2 weeks. The opposite sequence was applied in the second group. Preoperative and postoperative assessment (until 1 year after surgery) was performed using visual analogue scale (VAS), verbal scale (VS), Wisconsin brief pain questionnaire (WBPQ), McGill pain questionnaire (MPQ), McGill quality of life scale, and medication quantification scale.ResultsDuring the crossover trial, VAS, VS, WBPQ, and MPQ scores were significantly reduced in the"ON"- compared with the "OFF"-stimulation condition. One year after surgery, all clinical scores were significantly reduced compared with preoperative values. In particular, MCS decreased the affective MPQ subscore relative to the sensory MPQ subscore. Six of the 10 patients clearly benefited from MCS treatment.ConclusionsThese results were in favor of real analgesic effects produced by MCS with no loss of benefit over time. The differential changes in MPQ subscores suggested that MCS relieved pain by acting predominantly on its affective aspect. The decrease in pain intensity was associated with improved daily living activities and quality of life and reduced consumption of analgesic medication.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…