• Weiming Wang, Yan Liu, Tongsheng Su, Yuanjie Sun, and Zhishun Liu.
• Guang'an Men Hospital, China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences, Beijing, China.
• Int. J. Clin. Pract. 2019 Oct 17: e13435e13435.

ObjectiveTo explore whether obesity patients with a body mass index (BMI) of ≥25 kg/m2 who suffer from stress urinary incontinence (SUI) or stress-predominant mixed urinary incontinence (S-MUI) show less improvement in urinary incontinence (UI) symptoms after electroacupuncture (EA) treatment compared with non-obese counterparts.MethodsThis study was a secondary analysis of existing data. About 252 SUI patients and 250 S-MUI patients treated with the same EA regimen were assigned to one of the two groups: the obesity group for BMI ≥25 kg/m2 and the non-obesity group for BMI <25 kg/ m2 . The primary outcome was the proportion of treatment responders, defined as patients exhibiting a ≥50% reduction in 72-hours incontinence episode frequency, as measured by a 72-hours bladder diary at week 6 compared with baseline.ResultsOf the 1004 randomised women, 129 obese women (86 SUI and 43 S-MUI) and 255 non-obese women (166 SUI and 89 S-MUI) treated with EA were included in a secondary analysis. The primary outcome was that 58.3% (74/127) of patients in the obesity group and 60.7% (150/247) of patients in the non-obesity group (difference 0.55%; 95% confidence interval, -10.01 to 11.11; P = .919) responded to treatment.ConclusionThis study suggests that EA treatment may safely improve UI symptoms in both obese and non-obese patients, regardless of BMI category. Additionally, obesity status may not affect the efficacy of EA treatment on SUI or S-MUI among Chinese women.© 2019 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

9 keywords...

hide…