• Shock · Mar 2024

    Multicenter Study

    Development and Internal-External Validation of the aCCI-SOFA Model for Predicting In-Hospital Mortality of Patients with Sepsis-3 in the ICU: A Multicenter Retrospective Cohort Study.

    • Yueyue Huang, Yifan Gao, Shichao Quan, Hao Pan, Ying Wang, Yihua Dong, Lianmin Ye, Minmin Wu, Aiming Zhou, Xiangyuan Ruan, Baoxin Wang, Jie Chen, Chenfei Zheng, Honglei Xu, Yilun Lu, and Jingye Pan.
    • Department of Orthopaedics, The First Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, PR China.
    • Shock. 2024 Mar 1; 61 (3): 367374367-374.

    AbstractObjective: To achieve a better prediction of in-hospital mortality, the Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score needs to be adjusted and combined with comorbidities. This study aims to enhance the prediction of SOFA score for in-hospital mortality in patients with Sepsis-3. Methods: This study adjusted the maximum SOFA score within the first 3 days (Max Day3 SOFA) in relation to in-hospital mortality using logistic regression and incorporated the age-adjusted Charlson Comorbidity Index (aCCI) as a continuous variable to build the age-adjusted Charlson Comorbidity Index-Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (aCCI-SOFA) model. The outcome was in-hospital mortality. We developed, internally validated, and externally validated the aCCI-SOFA model using cohorts of Sepsis-3 patients from the MIMIC-IV, MIMIC-III (CareVue), and the FAHWMU cohort. The predictive performance of the model was assessed through discrimination and calibration, which was assessed using the area under the receiver operating characteristic and calibration curves, respectively. The overall predictive effect was evaluated using the Brier score. Measurements and main results: Compared with the Max Day3 SOFA, the aCCI-SOFA model showed significant improvement in area under the receiver operating characteristic with all cohorts: development cohort (0.81 vs 0.75, P < 0.001), internal validation cohort (0.81 vs 0.76, P < 0.001), MIMIC-III (CareVue) cohort (0.75 vs 0.68, P < 0.001), and FAHWMU cohort (0.72 vs 0.67, P = 0.001). In sensitivity analysis, it was suggested that the application of aCCI-SOFA in early nonseptic shock patients had greater clinical value, with significant differences compared with the original SOFA scores in all cohorts ( P < 0.05). Conclusion: For septic patients in intensive care unit, the aCCI-SOFA model exhibited superior predictive performance. The application of aCCI-SOFA in early nonseptic shock patients had greater clinical value.Copyright © 2024 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of the Shock Society.

      Pubmed     Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…

What will the 'Medical Journal of You' look like?

Start your free 21 day trial now.

We guarantee your privacy. Your email address will not be shared.