-
Internal medicine journal · May 2009
Bronchoscopic diagnosis of endoscopically visible lung malignancies: should cytologic examinations be performed routinely?
- Claudia Caroline Dobler and Archibald Barclay Hamish Crawford.
- Department of Respiratory Medicine, Liverpool Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
- Intern Med J. 2009 May 4.
AbstractAims: The aim of this study was to determine the diagnostic yield of flexible bronchoscopy in endoscopically visible malignancies and to evaluate whether cytological examination including bronchial washings and brushings increase the diagnostic yield compared with bronchial biopsy alone. Methods We reviewed a series of bronchoscopies over a period of 7.5 years in which an endoscopically visible tumour was identified and which had a definite cytological or histological diagnosis of pulmonary malignancy obtained by bronchoscopy or any other examination. Results The above criteria were met by 174 bronchoscopies. In 155 bronchoscopies all specimens including bronchial washings, brushings and biopsies were obtained, the overall diagnostic yield of which was 88%. This compared with a diagnostic yield of 77% for biopsies only (p<0.001). The individual diagnostic yields for biopsies, brushings and washings were 77%, 50% and 38%, respectively. The overall diagnostic yield of cytology was 61%, providing a diagnosis in 95 patients. Of 11 repeat bronchoscopies after an initial non-diagnostic bronchoscopy, 9 were diagnostic. Conclusions The tumour detection rate with flexible bronchoscopy in endoscopically visible lung malignancies is high. Cytology-based sampling techniques by means of bronchial washings and brushings significantly increase the overall diagnostic yield compared to forceps biopsy only. Repeat bronchoscopies after an initial non-diagnostic bronchoscopy have a relatively high diagnostic yield, and should therefore be considered in all patients with endoscopically visible tumour.
Notes
Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
- Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as
*italics*
,_underline_
or**bold**
. - Superscript can be denoted by
<sup>text</sup>
and subscript<sub>text</sub>
. - Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines
1. 2. 3.
, hyphens-
or asterisks*
. - Links can be included with:
[my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
- Images can be included with:
![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
- For footnotes use
[^1](This is a footnote.)
inline. - Or use an inline reference
[^1]
to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document[^1]: This is a long footnote.
.