• Jonathan W McMahon, Donald J Doukas, Christopher Hanuscin, John Quale, Julie Eason, Habtamu Asrat, Mark Silverberg, and Lorenzo Paladino.
• Department of Emergency Medicine, SUNY Downstate Health Sciences University and Kings County Hospital Center, Brooklyn, New York; Department of Internal Medicine, SUNY Downstate Health Sciences University and Kings County Hospital Center, Brooklyn, New York.
• J Emerg Med. 2024 Apr 1; 66 (4): e477e482e477-e482.

BackgroundMedical equipment can become scarce in disaster scenarios. Prior work has reported that four sheep could be ventilated together on a single ventilator. Others found that this maneuver is possible when needed, but no one has yet investigated whether cross-contamination occurs in co-ventilated individuals.ObjectiveOur goal was to investigate whether an infection could spread between co-ventilated individuals.MethodsFour 2-L anesthesia bags were connected to a sterilized ventilator circuit that used heat and moisture exchange filters and bacterial and viral filters, as would be expected in this dire scenario. Serratia marcescens was inoculated into "lung" no. 1. After running for 24 h, each lung and three additional points in the circuit were cultured to see whether S. marcescens had spread. These cultures were examined at 24 and 48 h to assess for cross-contamination. This entire procedure was performed three times.ResultsS. marcescens was not found in lung no. 2, 3, or 4 or the three additional sites on the expiratory limb at 24 and 48 h in all three trials.ConclusionsCross-contamination does not occur within 24 h using the described ventilator circuit configuration.Copyright © 2023 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

15 keywords...

hide…