• Ernest Azzopardi, Dean Boyce, Elayne Azzopardi, Hazim Sadideen, and Afshin Mosahebi.
• London Welbeck Hospital, UK; Consultant Surgeon in Private Practice, UK; University of Malta, Faculty of Medicine and Surgery, UK; University College London, Division of Surgery and Interventional Science, UK; Skinsurgeon Laser Suite, Malta. Electronic address: info@skinsurgeon.eu.
• Burns. 2024 Jun 1; 50 (5): 126912761269-1276.

BackgroundScarring, a pervasive issue spanning across medical disciplines, lacks a comprehensive terminology for effective communication, patient engagement, and outcome assessment. Existing scar classification systems are constrained by specific pathologies, physician-centric features, and inadequately account for emerging technologies. This study refrains from proposing yet another classification system and instead revisits the foundational language of scar morphology through a theme analysis of primary patient complaints.MethodData encompassing five years of a high-volume scar practice was analysed. Primary complaints were aggregated into collective descriptors and further organized into theme domains. The resulting hierarchical map of presenting complaints revealed five key domains: Loss of Function, Contour, Texture, Vector, and Colour Presenting complaints were codified into 42 items, which were then categorised into 14 collective descriptor terms. The latter were in turn organised into five overarching themes.ResultLoss of Function, accounting for 10% of primary concerns, signifies reduced function attributed solely to the scar. Contour, encompassing 41% of concerns, pertains to scar height, shape, and depth. Texture, representing 12% of concerns, denotes tactile variations such as hardness, roughness, and moisture. Vector, comprising 13% of concerns, refers to scar tissue tension and associated distortions. Colour, the concern in 24% of cases, encompasses variations in pigmentation, vascularity, and exogenous pigments.DiscussionStandardized terminology enhances patient care, communication, and research. This study underscores the fundamental question of "what bothers the patient," reviving a patient-centred approach to scar management. By prioritizing themes based on patient complaints, this study innovatively integrates function, aesthetics, and patient experience. In conclusion, this study pioneers a paradigm shift in scar management by presenting a patient-driven theme framework that offers a common language for healthcare professionals and patients. Embracing this language harmonizes scar treatment, fosters innovation, and transforms scars from silent reminders into stories of resilience and healing.Crown Copyright © 2024. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

17 keywords...

hide…