• Young-Baeg Kim, Sang-Gu Lee, Chan-Woo Park, Dong-Jun Kim, Youn-Kwan Park, Nak-Jung Sung, Sang-Ho Ahn, Jae-Sung Ahn, Hee-Suk Shin, Bum-Suk Lee, Jin-Hyok Kim, Chang-Hoon Jeon, and Korean Academy of Medical Sciences Committee for Evaluation of Spinal Impairment.
• Department of Neurosurgery, Chung-Ang University, Seoul, Korea.
• J. Korean Med. Sci. 2009 May 1; 24 Suppl 2 (Suppl 2): S307S313S307-13.

AbstractThe criteria for the evaluation of spinal impairment are diverse, complex, and have no standardized form. This makes it difficult and somewhat troublesome to accurately evaluate spinal impairment patients. A standardized guideline was studied for the evaluation of spinal impairment, based on the American Medical Association (AMA) Guides and the McBride method. This guideline proposal was developed by specialty medical societies under the Korean Academy of Medical Sciences. In this study, the grades of impairment were assessed by dividing patients into three different categories: spinal cord impairment, spinal injury impairment and spinal disorder impairment. The affected regions of the spine are divided into three: the cervical region, the thoracic region, and the lumbosacral region. The grade of impairment was differentially evaluated according to the affected region. The restricted range of motion was excluded in the evaluation spinal impairment because of low objectivity. Even though the new Korean guideline for the evaluation of spinal impairment has been proposed, it should be continuously supplemented and revised.

15 keywords...

hide…