• Amy Gore, Gary Huck, Soyon Bongiovanni, Susan Labagnara, Ilona Jacniacka Soto, Peter Yonclas, and David H Livingston.
• Division of Trauma and Surgical Critical Care (AG, PY, DHL), Department of Surgery, Rutgers-New Jersey Medical School, Newark, NJ.
• Ann. Surg. 2024 Aug 1; 280 (2): 340344340-344.

ObjectiveTo demonstrate that the creation of a Center for Trauma Survivorship (CTS) is not cost-prohibitive but is a revenue generator for the institution.BackgroundA dedicated CTS has been demonstrated to increase adherence with follow-up visits and improve overall aftercare in severely injured patients discharged from the trauma center. A potential impediment to the creation of similar centers is its assumed prohibitive cost.MethodsThis pre and post-cohort study examines the financial impact of patients treated by the CTS. Patients in the PRE cohort were those treated in the year before CTS inception. Eligibility criteria are trauma patients admitted who are ≥18 years of age and have a New Injury Severity Score ≥16 or intensive care unit stay ≥2 days. Financial data were obtained from the hospital's billing and cost accounting systems for a 1-year time period after discharge.ResultsThere were 176 patients in the PRE and 256 in the CTS cohort. The CTS cohort generated 1623 subsequent visits versus 748 in the PRE cohort. CTS patients underwent more follow-up surgery in their first year of recovery as compared with the PRE cohort (98 vs 26 procedures). Each CTS patient was responsible for a $7752 increase in net revenue with a positive contribution margin of $4558 compared with those in the PRE group.ConclusionsA dedicated CTS increases subsequent visits and necessary procedures and is a positive revenue source for the trauma center. The presumptive financial burden of a CTS is incorrect and the creation of dedicated centers will improve patients' outcomes and the institution's bottom line.Copyright © 2024 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.

18 keywords...

hide…