-
Comparative Study Clinical Trial
Behind closed doors: physician-patient discussions about colorectal cancer screening.
- Amy McQueen, L Kay Bartholomew, Anthony J Greisinger, Gilda G Medina, Sarah T Hawley, Paul Haidet, Judith L Bettencourt, Navkiran K Shokar, Bruce S Ling, and Sally W Vernon.
- Division of Health Behavior Research, Washington University, School of Medicine, 4444 Forest Park Ave., St Louis, MO 63108, USA. amcqueen@dom.wustl.edu
- J Gen Intern Med. 2009 Nov 1; 24 (11): 122812351228-35.
BackgroundDespite the availability of multiple effective screening tests for colorectal cancer, screening rates remain suboptimal. The literature documents patient preferences for different test types and recommends a shared decision-making approach for physician-patient colorectal cancer screening (CRCS) discussions, but it is unknown whether such communication about CRCS preferences and options actually occurs in busy primary-care settings.ObjectiveDescribe physician-patient CRCS discussions during a wellness visit.DesignCross-sectional; patients audio-recorded with physicians.ParticipantsA subset of patients (N = 64) participating in a behavioral intervention trial designed to increase CRCS who completed a wellness visit during the trial with a participating physician (N = 8).ApproachTranscripts were analyzed using qualitative methods.ResultsPhysicians in this sample consistently recommended CRCS, but focused on colonoscopy. Physicians did not offer a fecal occult blood test alone as a screening choice, which may have created missed opportunities for some patients to get screened. In this single visit, physicians' communication processes generally precluded discussion of patients' test preferences and did not facilitate shared decision-making. Patients' questions indicated their interest in different CRCS test types and appeared to elicit more information from physicians. Some patients remained resistant to CRCS after discussing it with a physician.ConclusionIf a preference for colonoscopy is widespread among primary-care physicians, the implications for intervention are either to prepare patients for this preference or to train physicians to offer options when recommending screening to patients.
Notes
Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
- Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as
*italics*
,_underline_
or**bold**
. - Superscript can be denoted by
<sup>text</sup>
and subscript<sub>text</sub>
. - Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines
1. 2. 3.
, hyphens-
or asterisks*
. - Links can be included with:
[my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
- Images can be included with:
![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
- For footnotes use
[^1](This is a footnote.)
inline. - Or use an inline reference
[^1]
to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document[^1]: This is a long footnote.
.