• Molly Carnes and Bennett Vogelman.
• 1 Center for Women's Health Research and Systems Engineering at the University of Wisconsin , Madison, Wisconsin.
• J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2015 May 1; 24 (5): 341348341-8.

AbstractThis commentary responds to the assertions by Foreman et al. that credentialing of women's health (WH) fellows by the American Board of Medical Subspecialties and accreditation of current and future WH fellowships by the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education would improve the health and healthcare of women by increasing the number of primary care providers competent to meet a growing clinical need. They speculate that such accreditation would raise the status of WH fellowships, increase the number of applicants, and result in more academic leaders in WH. They assert that curricular deficiencies in WH exist in physician training and that WH fellowships are the preferred means of training physicians to care for midlife women. We review the evidence to support or refute these claims and conclude that accrediting WH fellowships would not have the forecasted outcomes and would jeopardize the success of current WH fellowships.

12 keywords...

hide…